ThalesAsk ChatGPT: “top enterprise cybersecurity companies for critical infrastructure”
Is CGS Growth right for you?
GREAT MATCH
We are a good fit for you if:
you are a B2B SaaS, e-commerce, fintech, or enterprise company that already has content and traffic,
you want to be the answer in AI search and not a name buried in a list no one reads.
you already have an in-house marketing team/SEO agency doing traditional search SEO (we work alongside them) and you're ready to commit to at least 90 days - since LLM SEO has a compounding effect.
We're a particularly good fit if you care about pipeline attribution rather than just tracking visibility as a number on a dashboard.
LLM SEO is not an add-on service for us. We have our own methodology, our own tracking platform, and a team that works on this full-time.
NOT A MATCH
We are not a good fit for you if:
you don't have a website with content yet (we will advise you on traditional SEO first),
you are looking for quick results (LLM SEO typically takes between 60-90 days to show results),
you are looking for the cheapest possible LLM SEO agency for SaaS companies (we believe in quality over quantity),
you only care about Google and don't want to invest in every AI platform.
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything B2B and SaaS teams ask us before they start. Still unsure? Book a free AI visibility audit.
You already know traditional SEO: rank pages in Google, earn clicks from blue links. GEO is a different game. The goal is to get your brand named or recommended when someone asks ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Gemini a buying question. The signals that matter are different too. These models care more about entity authority, content structure, and third-party citations than about your backlink profile. You need both SEO and GEO, but they run on different playbooks and different KPIs.
A lot of SEO and content agencies have added this to their service pages over the past year. The question worth asking is whether the agency treats it as a line item inside an existing SEO retainer or as a standalone practice with its own methodology, tools, and reporting. We are the second kind. We built our own citation tracking platform, we run campaigns across five platforms, and we measure results separately from Google rankings.
We cover ChatGPT, Google Gemini (including AI Overviews), Perplexity, Claude, and Microsoft Copilot. Each one pulls from different sources, weighs content signals in its own way, and updates on its own schedule. If you optimize for ChatGPT only, the other four are open ground for your competitors.
Most clients see measurable changes in citations within 60 to 90 days. The first month goes into strategy, audit, and content restructuring. By months two and three, the optimized pages start getting picked up by models. From month four, the growth compounds, which is why we ask for at least 90 days before evaluating performance.
Four things. First, how often platforms cite your brand across the prompts we target. Second, which specific prompts trigger your brand and in what context: are you the named recommendation, or just one name in a list? Third, the ad-equivalent dollar value of that visibility. Fourth, change over time. All of this goes into a monthly Visibility Report. You can also verify any result yourself by pasting the same prompt into ChatGPT or Perplexity.
Mostly, yes. GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) zooms in on generative outputs specifically. AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) is broader and includes featured snippets and other direct-answer formats. LLM SEO covers optimization for any large language model. In practice, the work is the same: getting your brand into generated answers. We use the terms interchangeably, and so does most of the industry at this point.
Yes. Language models still pull heavily from content that ranks well in traditional search. Strong organic rankings, clean site architecture, and authoritative backlinks all feed into how these models evaluate your brand. We work alongside your existing SEO team or agency, not instead of them.
You already know traditional SEO: rank pages in Google, earn clicks from blue links. GEO is a different game. The goal is to get your brand named or recommended when someone asks ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Gemini a buying question. The signals that matter are different too. These models care more about entity authority, content structure, and third-party citations than about your backlink profile. You need both SEO and GEO, but they run on different playbooks and different KPIs.
A lot of SEO and content agencies have added this to their service pages over the past year. The question worth asking is whether the agency treats it as a line item inside an existing SEO retainer or as a standalone practice with its own methodology, tools, and reporting. We are the second kind. We built our own citation tracking platform, we run campaigns across five platforms, and we measure results separately from Google rankings.
We cover ChatGPT, Google Gemini (including AI Overviews), Perplexity, Claude, and Microsoft Copilot. Each one pulls from different sources, weighs content signals in its own way, and updates on its own schedule. If you optimize for ChatGPT only, the other four are open ground for your competitors.
Most clients see measurable changes in citations within 60 to 90 days. The first month goes into strategy, audit, and content restructuring. By months two and three, the optimized pages start getting picked up by models. From month four, the growth compounds, which is why we ask for at least 90 days before evaluating performance.
Four things. First, how often platforms cite your brand across the prompts we target. Second, which specific prompts trigger your brand and in what context: are you the named recommendation, or just one name in a list? Third, the ad-equivalent dollar value of that visibility. Fourth, change over time. All of this goes into a monthly Visibility Report. You can also verify any result yourself by pasting the same prompt into ChatGPT or Perplexity.
Mostly, yes. GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) zooms in on generative outputs specifically. AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) is broader and includes featured snippets and other direct-answer formats. LLM SEO covers optimization for any large language model. In practice, the work is the same: getting your brand into generated answers. We use the terms interchangeably, and so does most of the industry at this point.
Yes. Language models still pull heavily from content that ranks well in traditional search. Strong organic rankings, clean site architecture, and authoritative backlinks all feed into how these models evaluate your brand. We work alongside your existing SEO team or agency, not instead of them.
What You Can
Always Count On
We cannot guarantee specific AI outputs – no one can. What we can guarantee is total transparency in everything we do.
Month-to-month contractNo long-term lock-ins. Stay because results justify it, not because a contract forces you to.
Full content ownershipEvery article, schema block, and asset we create belongs to you from day one. Always.
Transparent AI reportingMonthly AI Visibility Report with citation tracking across all platforms you are targeting.
No hidden feesWhat we quote is what you pay. Tools, reporting, and Slack access are included in your retainer.
We deliberately avoid positioning CGS Growth as a "guarantee" agency. AI search results are dynamic – any agency promising guaranteed positions is misleading you.Our 90%+ retention rate is the clearest proof of outcomes we can offer.
Ready to Invest
in AI Visibility?
Citation authority in AI search compounds the same way backlink authority did a decade ago. The brands building it now will be exponentially harder to displace in twelve months. If you're reading this page, your competitors probably are too.